| 热点关注:中国城市社会企业家初探 | |||
| 2006-09-28 胡刚 张菁 杨国琼 点击: 3119 | |||
| |||
Feb 11, 2009
Article: 中国城市社会企业家初探
Jun 23, 2008
Young and Restless China
The PBS FRONTLINE documentary, "Young and Restless in China" explores what it means to be coming of age in China today. Starting in 2004, the film tracks four ambitious MBA graduates who are 2024 members as well as a media savvy hip hop artist, two migrant workers living precariously on society’s edge, a dedicated medical resident and a courageous environmental activist.
What happens along the way is surprising: some of those featured in the film find themselves torn between traditional culture and tantalizing new opportunities; several begin the heady ride to wealth and power. Some find love and resolve family conflicts, and others seem likely to crash and burn along the way.
As we watch these young people work, hang out with family and friends, sing karaoke or launch their first business, we come to know them in a rare, intimate way. In unusual detail, YOUNG & RESTLESS IN CHINA captures the highs and lows of coming of age in this time of China’s extreme transition and change.
Jun 17, 2008
Developing China's Nonprofit Sector
By Mark Yu-Ting Chen, Lincoln J. Pan, and Hai Wu
McKinsey Quarterly, August 2006
Like most segments of China's economy, the nonprofit sector has grown at a heady pace over the past few years, expanding from roughly 6,000 registered groups in 1999 to about 150,000 in 2005. (1) While this growth is remarkable, weak management skills and a lack of resources are making it hard for nonprofits to meet the rising demand for their services. Multinational corporations in China can help by targeting their donations to improve the organizational performance of nonprofits and by offering training and expert counseling. At the same time, China's nonprofits must create an infrastructure to strengthen the sector, in part by channeling corporate aid more effectively.
Nonprofit organizations were almost nonexistent in China before the onset of economic reforms, in the 1980s. As the sector grew, corporate philanthropy focused on funding primary education, programs to alleviate poverty (such as microfinancing for farmers), and health initiatives. These efforts helped nonprofits to acquire physical assets, such as school buildings and clinics, but programs and physical assets alone are not enough to support a nonprofit's long-term development. To achieve the most impact, corporate philanthropy must combine more flexible financial support with a hands-on effort to teach nonprofits the skills critical to running organizations effectively.
Beyond giving corporations more control over how their contributions are used, this new approach would help them demonstrate a greater commitment to improving China's social welfare, make them more attractive to potential recruits, and perhaps strengthen their relations with the government. It would also allow them to become more knowledgeable about social issues, such as the environment, that are likely to influence business decisions in China over the coming years.
To date, corporations have made little progress in understanding China's nonprofit sector, despite their interest in establishing a philanthropic track record. To help determine the causes for this problem we examined more than 100 nonprofit organizations in China and undertook an in-depth analysis of more than 40 of them. We talked to hundreds of stakeholders, including donors and nonprofit leaders, as well as current and former government officials.
The evolution of China's nonprofit sector
These nonprofits couldn't cope with the variety of new social issues resulting from China's rapid economic growth, however. The cost of medical care and higher education, for instance, has risen beyond what many Chinese citizens can afford. In addition, issues such as HIV/AIDS, rural unemployment, and pollution are putting even more strain on existing public services.
These concerns led to the emergence of a second wave of nonprofits, including a growing number of independent grassroots organizations. Few of these groups are more than five years old and most have only one full-time employee. Nevertheless, they play an increasingly significant role in Chinese society.
Initially, many grassroots groups came under heavy scrutiny from the government, which feared that they could be politically destabilizing. While the government continues to monitor some groups - particularly those with religious and political leanings - it offers support to an increasing number of nonprofits.
In late 2004, for example, the Ministry of Civil Affairs announced a new framework to recognize the foundations that finance charity in China and to offer them a variety of tax deductions, including exemption from stamp duty. Legislation institutionalizing the framework is currently under review. Officials have also initiated discussions on a comprehensive philanthropy law that would create a certification process for nonprofit organizations and provide tax deductions for individual and corporate donors.
Today the main obstacle to the nonprofits' development is neither government scrutiny nor the level of demand. Rather, nonprofits in China face unique challenges arising from the sector's immaturity and from a development path that has neglected social issues and grassroots organizations because it's guided largely by the government. The most pressing challenges - a weak funding base and a lack of resources to support critical training and counsel - are both exacerbated by the unprecedented growth in demand for nonprofit services.
Hurdles for nonprofit development
Chinese nonprofits face funding shortfalls and a skewed distribution of resources. In 2005, charitable contributions in China, including funds given to the government for disaster relief, totaled some 0.05 percent of the nation's GDP, compared with 0.09 percent in India, 0.84 in the United Kingdom, and nearly 2 percent in the United States. Very little overall contributions come from domestic sources: we estimate that international organizations and corporations account for 80 percent of all donations to Chinese charities. (4) (That figure is just 0.5 percent in the United States.) Donations from domestic companies are particularly low: a sampling of the leading ones indicates that, on average, they contribute less than 0.3 percent of their posttax income to charity, compared with more than 2 percent for most Fortune 500 corporations.
Domestic giving is likely to increase as the country's affluent class matures and charitable organizations become more established. In the meantime, the dearth of funding makes life particularly difficult for grassroots organizations. Government-affiliated nonprofits absorb 85 percent of all available resources, leaving little for the burgeoning number of smaller groups. In addition, most charitable giving in China flows through large nonprofits and government-organized NGOs based in Beijing and Shanghai - areas where nonprofits cluster, information about them is more easily obtained, and corporate efforts are more visible. Organizations outside these huge urban centers tend to be left out.
The nonprofit sector also lacks training programs and resource centers to support the development of its business skills. The dominance of government-established NGOs, which tap government resources to build these capabilities, has forestalled the formation of a strong independent support network. A growing number of grassroots organizations - particularly those operating outside the biggest cities - will require such an infrastructure to get the resources and training they need.
Many nonprofits have relied on their entrepreneurial ability and the unwavering commitment of their founders to overcome the hurdles and create innovative, sustainable programs. These organizations will doubtless grow stronger in response to legal and regulatory measures intended to develop the sector. We estimate that from 500 to 800 high-caliber nonprofit organizations in China have the scale, impact, and expansion potential to benefit greatly from the increased managerial skills and other kinds of support that corporations could provide.
One example is the Sherig Norbu Jigme Gyaltsen School, in Qinghai province. Qinghai's public schools provide only a modern Chinese education, in Mandarin, while the region's Tibetan monasteries don't have the resources to teach students modern sciences and languages. To serve Qinghai's large population of Tibetan children better, Jigme Gyaltsen founded the Sherig Norbu in 1994, using personal savings of 3,000 renminbi ($400) and about 13,000 renminbi in borrowed money. The school combines a traditional Tibetan education, which includes logic and debating techniques rooted in Buddhism, with a modern Chinese education taught in Mandarin and English.
The school operates several for-profit businesses, including a Ragya yak cheese factory, which accounts for a significant part of its annual income (27 percent in 2004). Despite Sherig Norbu's success, it could benefit from corporate support - rudimentary management skills, for example, could help improve the sales and distribution of its cheese.
The corporate challenge
In 2004 multinational corporations in China donated $50 million to $75 million to the country's NGOs. While financial support is always welcome, these companies would make a greater impact by directing their money more effectively and by complementing their financial support with help in developing the nonprofits' management and operating skills - making experienced staff available, for example.
In-kind services with intellectual muscle
In some countries, nonprofit organizations have access to paid and pro bono networks of accountants, consultants, lawyers, and trainers. The Boston-based group New Sector Alliance, for example, coordinates the activities of a variety of volunteers (including professionals, MBA students, and undergraduates) to advise and train nonprofits. Only a handful of organizations have initiated comparable training programs for China's nonprofits, despite the glaring need.
Corporations can help fill this gap by, for instance, funding research into social issues or allowing employees to dedicate a specific number of hours each year to help Chinese nonprofits, which, unlike their counterparts in more developed economies, need training in basic business skills such as accounting, management, marketing, and logistics and distribution. Corporations can teach these skills effectively through long-term volunteer projects.
Such projects offer companies two benefits that funding alone cannot. First, the direct transfer of skills and services gives donors greater control over the outcome of their philanthropic efforts. Second, by creating a window into the nonprofits' operations, this kind of interaction will enable companies to tailor their future donations.
Consider the potential impact of the corporate presence at a grassroots organization that provides housing and psychological counseling for children of incarcerated parents. In 1998 Zhang Shuqin established Sun Village at Xian, in central China. The organization now has four centers serving more than 400 students, as well as a solid base of corporate donors. It also solicits donations for planting jujube trees on its land and then sells the fruit, used in Chinese medicine, to generate additional revenue.
Sun Village has been slow to expand, despite adequate funding and increasing demand for its services. Instead of adding new ones or building new centers, it has become overly focused on day-to-day operations. Zhang continues to make nearly every organizational decision - from setting funding targets to determining how the van is used. Corporate volunteers could help by coaching managers in how to set strategic goals, raise funds, and delegate responsibility.
Corporate executives should also seek seats on the advisory boards of nonprofit organizations. Until recently, these boards often didn't function well, since the benefits of organizational governance were not fully understood. Our discussions, however, show that nonprofits are slowly recognizing the need for greater corporate participation and are increasingly open to extending the invitation to private-sector executives. Board representation not only allows a company to ensure that its donations are used wisely but also gives it the opportunity to improve the governance and professionalism of nonprofits and to enhance their performance in the vital areas of marketing and strategic planning.
Funding human resources and training
In addition to providing volunteers, corporations should rethink the way they distribute charity to nonprofits. Most organizations direct their donations toward program expenses (such as the operating costs of a school or a women's center) but not the costs of administration, fund-raising, or staff development. Further, many donors focus on issues that are high on the government's list of priorities (and therefore widely publicized), such as the environment, vocational education, and improving rural villages. As a result, many nonprofits amend their programs merely to increase the donations they receive - even if in doing so they neglect their core mission. Because funds for environmental problems were available, for instance, one of China's larger, education-focused organizations developed side projects to address them; another nonprofit, which operates orphanages, has started a number of vocational-education projects purely to attract donors. Diversification would be appropriate if these organizations had the right skills, but given their tight resources and narrow capabilities they would be better off focusing on their core mission.
To encourage nonprofits to deepen their program expertise and expand their core capabilities, corporations can supply funds to improve the way they develop, recruit, and retain employees. Providing the resources to build and staff a school is helpful, for instance, but corporate support of teacher training - directly or through third-party organizations - will go further toward sustaining nonprofits in the longer term. At Sun Village, for example, a corporation might consider paying for programs to train employees in psychological counseling or providing them with child care.
Corporations should also provide more multiyear grants. Donors in China generally offer support for only one year at a time, on the theory that the annual reapplication process is the best way to motivate and assess a nonprofit's performance. However, this practice creates significant administrative burdens. A typical midsize organization with 5 to 15 workers, for example, may write more than 25 grant proposals a year, expecting to receive funds for perhaps 5 to 12 of them. Multiyear grants, which would lighten this administrative task, could be made conditional on meeting specific performance targets, reviewed regularly.
Creating a new nonprofit infrastructure
While the private sector's participation is critical to developing nonprofits in China, they themselves must initiate reforms aimed at building skills and resources. China needs to develop national organizations, similar to the International Red Cross, that can direct funding and services to grassroots nonprofits, for example. With government-established NGOs absorbing most of the available funds, the current allocation of resources is inefficient. Large NGOs are not always best placed to respond to society's changing needs, whereas smaller, more nimble grassroots organizations may be better able to tailor services to local conditions. In Shanghai, for instance, an organization called MOPA Housekeeping not only employs and trains migrant workers so they can perform basic housecleaning services but also provides cultural centers and group homes to help them manage the difficult transition from rural to urban life - a need that larger nonprofits have overlooked. The creation of Chinese foundations focused on supporting small, grassroots nonprofits would make resources more widely available.
Some government-affiliated NGOs have the capacity and scope to organize national foundations. Their strengths include good relationships with the Chinese government, networks of volunteers, stable international and domestic financial support, and experienced managers. The China Youth Development Foundation, for example, is in a good position to take on this challenge: it channels resources to smaller nonprofits that concentrate on rural education and youth-centered projects but that work in ways (or areas) that the foundation's own efforts don't cover.
A network of domestic foundations could help spur the development of national resource centers to provide nonprofits with advice, teach them fund-raising skills, and perform research services. Currently, the one-year-old NPO (Nonprofit) Development Center, in Shanghai, and the six-year-old China NPO Network, in Beijing, plan to offer some of these services. But there is room - and need - for more. Corporations could ally themselves with large NGOs to finance both domestic foundations and national nonprofit resource centers, particularly in the interior and western regions where China needs them most.
Finally, China's leading nonprofits can set and publicize governance standards for themselves and others in the sector. The China Youth Development Foundation, the China Foundation for Poverty Alleviation, and the NPO Network, for example, have begun discussions to create an initiative to build public trust, attract donors, and establish nonprofit standards, including audited financial statements, functioning boards of directors, Web portals, and appropriate organizational structures. Nonprofits that meet such standards would receive formal recognition as "higher-quality" organizations. While this initiative is a good first step, it must be implemented fully and effectively to serve as a catalyst for change, and similar efforts should be established at the national level.
Increased government and private-sector efforts will be critical to ensuring that China's nonprofit organizations can respond effectively to the growing demand for their services. Corporations can choose from a variety of tactics beyond monetary donations in order to provide China's proliferating nonprofits with the most useful resources - financial and beyond - and to supplement the government's efforts to help these groups build a sustainable future for the country.
Mark Yu-Ting Chen is an alumnus of McKinsey's Taipei office of and adviser to McKinsey; Lincoln Pan is an alumnus of the Hong Kong office; Hai Wu is a principal in the Beijing office.
This article was originally published in the McKinsey Quarterly.
May 30, 2008
Officially, nongovernmental organizations in China must register with the government; the larger groups are as rigid and controlled as their official sponsors. Authorities remain deeply suspicious of smaller, independent groups.
Now, however, aided by the proliferation of online bulletin boards, blogs and on-the-ground coordination centers, unregistered grass-roots organizations are essentially functioning as legitimate earthquake-relief NGOs, operating for the first time without having to look over their shoulders and helping to manage a crisis whose death toll could surpass 80,000.
Here in this ruined town, about 40 miles from the epicenter of the May 12 earthquake, a ragtag group of citizens -- a shopkeeper from Guizhou province, his friends and a volunteer worker who knew the way -- emerged the other day after a four-hour trip.
They had placed homemade signs in their vehicles' front windows that said "food and medicine." With miniature video cameras in hand, the group's members looked like tourists. But in delivering medical gloves, antibiotic cream, and fresh cucumbers and cabbages to the front, they had done more to get replacement supplies to rescuers than government troops had managed.
"Fantastic! We've got shortages. We really need fresh vegetables," said Wu Jun, head of a military university hospital, meeting the convoy in a camouflage T-shirt and carrying a sheaf of papers. "Our supply units went to the vegetable wholesale market in Chengdu, but there was nothing left."
The volunteer who had led the civilian convoy to Yingxiu was actually a member of the Chengdu Urban Rivers Association, which has set up a makeshift coordination center at its office to aid relief efforts. Xia Lu knew that the road here, littered with grisly car wrecks and fallen boulders, had recently reopened. She also knew which supplies were needed, having made the same trek only five days earlier and talking with soldiers.
Since the earthquake, the coordination center has fielded hundreds of calls and e-mails, using staffers who were already in the field just before the quake as well as other contacts and volunteers.
"We operate like a traffic-control center," Tian Jun, executive director of the river association and head of the coordination center, said as she juggled meetings and phone calls last week. "We get information from the front, either from our own staff or from others, and post it online. Volunteers then buy or bring in supplies, and we direct the supplies to where they're needed."
Alternatively, volunteers and other grass-roots organizations call Tian to tell her what they have in their cars. She then calls contacts in quake-affected towns to see what they need. "In either case, we will supervise the whole process to make sure the need is real and properly satisfied," Tian said.
In a room down the hall -- stocked with donated boxes of milk powder, disinfectant, soap, peanuts, sterile gauze and bags of rice -- two newly arrived volunteers waited for an assignment.
"We're retired, and we really hurt in our hearts when we saw what happened here," said Zhang Liying, 50, who rode a train for 38 hours from the coastal city of Tianjin to Chengdu, the provincial capital of Sichuan province. "We want to help the soldiers to cook. Whatever help they need, we will do it."
Mu Wenzhi, the shopkeeper from Guizhou, had the same reaction. He said he and his wife cried while watching TV news reports about the earthquake. He had never volunteered for anything before but, right away, he asked his wife to mind the store. He and six friends pooled their money to buy food.
"We arrived in Dujiangyan on May 14 at 2 a.m., after a 15-hour drive," Mu said, describing his three trips to the earthquake zone, as his four-car convoy waited for other vehicles to pass on the narrow road to Yingxiu. "We were resting in our van when suddenly a group of retired soldiers knocked on our window. They said there was an emergency in Xiang'e town and asked us to unload our supplies and drive them there."
In Xiang'e, an old woman watching Mu eat biscuits turned out to have barely eaten. "She had only drunk two bottles of water and eaten three packages of instant noodles for the past three days," Mu said. "That's when we realized that people were in urgent need of supplies. We went back to Xishui on May 16, organized four cars, bought several truckloads of food in two hours and drove straight back."
Mu and other volunteers are getting tips from television news and people they meet in the earthquake zone, not from government bureaucrats. "No one from the government told us what to do," said Tian, of the river association. "In this urgent situation, we decided to share some of their responsibility."
Xiao Qiang, director of the China Internet Project and a Chinese media expert at the University of California at Berkeley, said some smaller, unregistered NGOs had teams of volunteers in the quake zone almost as fast as the military had troops there.
"Many self-organized social networks are not formal organizations, but altogether their numbers, resources and role in society is much larger than what the government has officially allowed in the past," Xiao said.
So far, authorities seem pleased with the mobilization, which includes many first-time volunteers and members of social groups such as car clubs and outdoor sports organizations.
"The Chinese people, who have always been criticized for only being good at infighting, have been surprisingly united and therefore powerful in their togetherness," the state-run Beijing Youth Daily editorialized Tuesday. "Grass-roots organizations, which were considered weak due to their lack of a supportive environment, have shown effective organizing and enforcing abilities in the rescue work and proven themselves as healthy and positive forces in society."
No one expects Beijing to relax the rules governing NGOs, and there's no sign that officials will make it easier for grass-roots groups to organize or raise funds, particularly in the politically sensitive period leading up to the Aug. 8-24 Olympic Games.
In fact, authorities have stepped up their surveillance of AIDS activists in the capital and pressured Beijing-based human rights lawyers not to meet with visiting U.S. representatives this week. On Wednesday, Communist Party loyalists hacked into and shut down a Web site run by a leading Tibetan writer and critic of government policies toward Tibet.
"The government will not automatically be more open toward NGOs," said Guo Hong, a Chengdu-based sociology professor and volunteer at the makeshift earthquake coordination center in Chengdu. "But I hope they will establish a system for NGOs where they address what kind of social organizations will be allowed to help develop society and what kind of participation will be allowed."
In the long run, another volunteer said, the policy toward NGOs will be more open, but that doesn't mean it will just get easier. "It's like the earthquake. There will be aftershocks, but you don't know when and you don't know how big," said Gao Guizi, director of the Sichuan Social Development Research Institute.
"From this disaster, the government has come to realize the power of the grass roots," Guo said. "This power will be helpful in establishing and managing a real civil society. But the problem is how to allow the grass-roots groups to take part in an orderly way. Taxi drivers used to be considered the least-educated and least-civilized group, but they were the first to respond to the disaster, organizing themselves to drive the injured to hospitals."
May 27, 2008
China: Roused by Disaster
http://www.time.com/time/printout/0,8816,1808638,00.html
The highway leading to Yingxiu, a small town near the epicenter of China's May 12 earthquake, is rent by fissures big Publish Postenough to swallow a child and is choked with smashed trucks and enormous rocks. Near the town's outskirts, just past a car that has been crushed by a boulder, a landslide cuts off the road entirely. A mother who walked into the mountains beyond to bring out her 12-year-old son says he's been scarred by what he's seen. The landscape they are leaving behind is hellish, she says--putrefying bodies, collapsed schools, buried roads and rows of wrecked houses. But the situation doesn't faze two friends who have traveled here by train, car and, finally, on foot to help victims of the Wenchuan earthquake. Dressed in white T shirts reading I [heart] CHINA, the men are determined to reach the core of the devastation. "After we saw the news of the disaster, we decided we had to help," says Wu Guanglei, a 36-year-old high school physics teacher from Zigong, a town 186 miles (300 km) to the south. "We Chinese people are growing closer and closer together," says Wu Xiangping, 28, who took a leave from his job at a Beijing advertising firm to join the relief effort. "And because of that, the country's morality is rising too."
These simple observations, stated with a tinge of hope and pride, crystallize much of what China as a nation has learned about itself over the past two weeks. The 8.0-magnitude quake, the country's worst natural disaster in more than 30 years, has probably killed at least 50,000 and has left more than 5 million homeless, according to official sources. Horrific videos from the disaster zone--the twisted bodies of children layered like fossils in the sediment of a pancaked concrete schoolhouse, the desperate decision to amputate the legs of a dying girl pinned in rubble--forced the Chinese people to look into the abyss. And reflected was the image of a more compassionate nation than many had perhaps expected, where tens of millions of Chinese lined up for hours to make sure their donations of cash or food or clothes were accepted and where tens of thousands of others like the Wus left their jobs and families and rushed to aid their compatriots. The roads to the disaster zone were jammed with cars carrying banners that read RESIST THE QUAKE: PROVIDE RELIEF and WHEN ONE HAS DIFFICULTY, EIGHT ASSIST. The traffic was so overwhelming that authorities had to close the roads and turn back volunteers. So many clothes were contributed that they were piled in mounds six feet (two meters) high in some devastated towns. Within days, contributions from the country's private companies, not known for their charity, had hit a billion dollars and were still rising.
The outpouring of support has been a revelation. For years, China's citizens couldn't watch the evening news without being reminded of their darker side, of the grasping, reckless self-interest that has characterized China's headlong rush to become wealthy and powerful--stories of slave labor and child-kidnapping rings, rampant government corruption, counterfeit products, tainted food, dangerous toys and, lately, the brutal crackdown on dissent in Tibet. But from a monstrous humanitarian crisis has come a new self-awareness, a recognition of the Chinese people's sympathy and generosity of spirit. The earthquake has been a "shock of consciousness," as Wenran Jiang, a China scholar at the University of Alberta, puts it, a collective epiphany when the nation was suddenly confronted with how much it had changed in two decades of booming growth and how some changes have been for the better.
Of course, when the national emergency abates, much of China will revert to its familiar ways. But something fundamental has changed. There is a new confidence in the ability, even duty, of ordinary Chinese to contribute to building a more virtuous society and a willingness to press the government for the right to do so. Most of those volunteering were doing so for the first time, for example, and many said they were eager to do more community work in the future. Says Jiang: "It's a major leap forward in the formation of China's civil society, which is vital for China's future democratization process." That doesn't mean the Wenchuan earthquake will lead directly to elections in the next few years, but the complex and shifting relationship between the Communist Party and increasingly vociferous Chinese citizens will probably evolve into some form of compromise between autocratic control and Western-style democracy.
It's not just China's self-perception that has changed. The quake has altered, at least temporarily, the world's perception of China, whose growing economic and military might is viewed with suspicion and fear in many quarters. China's relationship with the democratic West has been particularly strained of late, after March's bloody demonstrations in Tibet and the chaotic protests that dogged the Olympic-torch relay. But the quake, coming just 10 days after Cyclone Nargis ripped into Burma, has cast the Chinese government in a different light. By blocking foreign aid, Burma's paranoid military junta demonstrated just how impotent and callous to the suffering of its citizens a repressive autocracy can be. But even Beijing's critics expressed admiration for China's swift response to the quake.
In turn, some of China's most xenophobic bloggers have expressed astonishment at the sympathy shown for China by the rest of the world, the donations of cash and goods and the dispatch of foreign search-and-rescue teams, doctors and other personnel. The outpouring of international goodwill "has changed everything," says a senior Western diplomat based in Beijing. "Now many people will be cheering for the Chinese and hoping they pull off a good show at the Olympics. That will be pivotal for China's self-confidence and its perception of its place in the world."
A Nation's Agony
If the crisis had a defining moment, it came on May 19 at 2:28 p.m., exactly a week after the quake. That was when the entire country paused for three minutes. Traffic came to a halt, flags were lowered to half-mast, and Chinese everywhere stood in oft tearful silence to honor the victims of the Wenchuan quake, named for the county at its epicenter. Drivers honked their horns, and factories sounded their sirens in a collective wail of agony. The ritual marked the start of three days of national mourning, during which Internet activities like online gaming were halted and all TV channels except those broadcasting news were blacked out.
This cathartic outpouring of national grief helped put to rest the notion that China lacks civic spirit. Academics have long argued that Confucian ideals, which emphasize duty to family, have mutated over the millenniums into a national mentality that views contributions to nonrelatives as a waste of precious personal resources. This trait was exaggerated by the beggar-thy-neighbor capitalism that has been Chinese society's driving force for the past two decades. Charitable donations from individuals and businesses in China amount to about 0.09% of the gdp, compared with 2% in the U.S.
But in the space of a few weeks, China has shown that not only do its people know how to grieve but they also know how to give. And the charity isn't coming from just private companies and wealthy citizens; many of those donating are poor Chinese making enormous sacrifices. Waiting patiently in line at the Red Cross Society of China office in Beijing on May 19 was Liang Baoying, a 63-year-old retired teacher. Clutching an envelope containing the equivalent of $287--her monthly pension--Liang tearfully said she could no longer watch news of the quake on TV because it was too sad. "I believe this is a national tragedy, so we have no choice but to give. I'm sure the Red Cross will use the donation properly."
Thousands are doing even more. The China Youth Daily reported that an estimated 200,000 citizen volunteers from all over China have descended on the quake zone, providing food, shelter and medical treatment, their convoys of vehicles sometimes causing traffic jams on the narrow mountains roads of Sichuan province. Private aid takes many forms--beef trucked from Inner Mongolia, sleeping bags shipped from Shenzhen, building materials from Chongqing, millions of bottles of water and packets of instant noodles. Volunteers are working in areas overlooked by government relief efforts. In the village of Yongan, south of the devastated city of Beichuan, quake victims, from the very young to the very old, line the road, waiting for the citizen cavalry to arrive. "We're counting on volunteers to bring us food," says Wang Shaoqing, 82. As he speaks, children run up to the cars of volunteers, who stop and hand them food and water bottles through the windows.
The dedication of the volunteers has been covered in the state media with almost the same enthusiasm that's been given to the performance of the 120,000 People's Liberation Army troops and paramilitary police officers in the disaster area. The normally muzzled Chinese press has been freed by the information ministry to saturate the airwaves with quake coverage. The leash on the Internet was also loosened. Popular blogs have been uncensored; commentators posting to mainstream discussion forums were even allowed to criticize the government's handling of some aspects of the relief--the failure to use helicopters for the first three days after the quake, for example.
As surprising as the freedom is the sophistication of the coverage. It's on television and radio round the clock, and newspapers have put out special editions. An anchor even dressed down a reporter on air for broadcasting from the comfort of her hotel room rather than venturing into the field. "Three to five years ago, both the state media and the online world simply wouldn't have had the energy, experience or skill to do coverage on this scale," says Xiao Qiang, a Chinese-media expert at the University of California, Berkeley. "It's going to progress just as much in the next three to five years too. It's not going to be total media freedom, but it is a big step in the empowerment of China's civil society."
Unlikely Hero, Familiar Villains
One of the most widely praised aspects of the relief operation was the speed and scale with which the government responded. And to Chinese and foreigners alike, the man primarily responsible for that was the country's Premier, Wen Jiabao, 65. Within two hours of the earthquake, Wen was on a plane to the disaster area, and for the next four days, Chinese TV was flooded with images of the increasingly exhausted-looking leader as he rallied the relief forces, offered succor to survivors and even choked up.
Wen has long been the human face of the Communist Party. Netizens responded rapturously. "I couldn't help crying when I saw the pictures of Premier Wen in the stricken region," wrote a poster in a typical comment. "I feel very safe to have a wonderful leader like this." The praise will reassure the party hierarchy. Having long since discarded their Marxist-Leninist ideology, China's leaders are increasingly dependent on the approval of the public for their legitimacy; the survival of the party may ultimately depend on its handling of crises.
Wen's star turn notwithstanding, the real danger to the party comes from its rotten base: the county and township officials whose corruption and venality have had the greatest impact on the lives of hundreds of millions of Chinese. There's sure to be a backlash over the number of children killed by the quake, buried in their classrooms as shoddily built schools collapsed around them. In the days following the quake, blogs and online message boards teemed with demands for answers as to why so many schools were destroyed. In one structure alone--the three-story Juyuan Middle School in Dujiangyan--at least 600 students died. "It was built out of tofu," says Hu Yuefu, 44, of the building that collapsed and killed his 15-year-old daughter Huishans. He holds local government officials and building contractors responsible. "I hope there is an investigation," Hu says. "Otherwise, there are a thousand parents who would beat them to death."
Corruption has proved an inflammatory issue in the past--it was one of the driving forces behind the Tiananmen Square protests in 1989--and mixed with student deaths, it could be explosive. Beijing's first instinct will be to sweep the schools scandal under the rug. Much of the online anger over the collapsed schools has been deleted, and all discussion of the topic has been banned. But the University of Alberta's Jiang says that as China's civil society develops, leaders know they must adapt. "It will be extremely tempting for the control types and ideologues to use the earthquake to glorify the party and to direct this new openness toward reporting only good news," he says. "But that will be one step backward out of two steps forward--no more."
It's hard to see how Beijing can stifle the civic impulses of the millions of Chinese who have been stirred into action by the humanitarian crisis. The earthquake has exposed how much China has changed and given a fleeting glimpse of what might be. The political and cultural aftershocks will roll on for years after the ground has ceased to tremble.
With reporting by With Reporting by Austin Ramzy, Lin Yang/Yingxiu
- Find this article at:
- http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1808638,00.html
May 25, 2008
China's Citizen Sector Rises through Earthquake
China's citizen organizations, web-groups, either officially registered or not, have played a major role in earth quake relief efforts, to be reckoned with by the government. Their power of mobilization and coordination, once given the platform (recognized and accepted by the government) can play an important role in the society. The earthquake has helped proved that. (xh)
中国地下NGO地震之后见天日 政府采取宽容态度 亚洲周刊
《亚洲周刊》朱一心/中国NGO在灾后成立救灾平台,大批‘地下NGO’积极救灾,得以见天日,而政府也采取宽容态度。香港NGO以专业及良好的管理,配合大陆NGO的网络,协调统筹救灾。
汶川大地震发生后一小时,雷刚抱着电脑坐在街头,两脚仍在发抖,他找到一个消防栓,把电脑放上去,打开,上线。‘太好了!网络没中断!还有很多人在线上! ’他立即向‘爱白成都青年同志中心’服务的一百多个QQ群发出救灾讯息:请大家立即查看所在城镇的伤者及惊惶失措的人们,为他们作出心理干预(心理辅 导),并开放自己的家居作临时避难所。
同步发生的,是深圳、广州及北京等大城市以及香港NGO(非政府组织)干事及志愿者,都第一时间往成都进发。而零三年首个获中国政府批准注册的成都NGO -成都城市河流研究会秘书长田军,以及香港NGO社区伙伴项目统筹何德贤,临时被推举为救灾NGO的指挥官。一边有动员能力,一边有管理能力,两边结成网 络,协调统筹,立即就行动起来。
一场惨痛的灾难,一夜间令大部分中国地下NGO都站到亮处,承担救灾义务,而政府也对他们包容,让一直‘发育不良’的地下NGO得见天日,政府各部门还提 供方便,为NGO建构庞大救援空间。这大批无偿的义务民间组织,过去十年来在中国散播人道关怀和培训志愿者的种子,使得这次救灾工作一呼百应。
雷刚是爱白中心的项目协调员,爱白每年均与香港及本土十多个NGO,联手为四川省培训志愿者,把种子撒播大地,大灾像一声春雷,民间的‘种籽’迅即发芽, 带动更多志愿者走上救灾之路。地震发生后二十三小时,五月十三日中午一时半,爱白向外发布一百个QQ群救灾行动的简报,并迅速与二十多个成都基地的本土及 国际NGO联合,建立‘五一二民间救助服务小组’(十五日再成立五一二中心),与另一个NGO平台‘NGO四川救灾联合办公室’,成为这次八级大地震救灾 工作的两大NGO平台。
走进成都东城根街的河流研究室,墙上贴满大张分工表,写着天涯网络三十吨物资运到、国际小母牛几十吨的物资来了……‘这么多年来,各个NGO互相合作,建 立了一个极大的草根网络,可以接触灾区很远很孤独的小村,甚至只有十余间房子,灾后没人理的农村,我们尽力转介,并尝试援助药物及物资。’来自香港、正在 研究室指挥救灾工作的何德贤,边忙着审批项目,边跟亚洲周刊记者说。走在她身旁商量工作的田军,也在多个房间穿梭忙碌。来自成都的田军说:‘我们这里什么 专家也有;NGO这东西比较复杂,政府一直很担心我们的活动会影响稳定,但现在我们有的是灵活性和有经验的志愿者。’
以公司注册名义生存了九年的爱白,平时擅长心理辅导,来自全国各地的注册心理治疗师一下子就组成了四组心理辅导组,每组分配八至十五人,负责整合及培训灾 后辅导人员,再由他们到前线工作。田军不远处,正是忙着在电脑上工作的雷刚,这位资深义工平时是位旅游从业员,他说:‘五一二平台现在已召集了一千多名志 愿者,这个民间平台很棒。’
提供有序救援工作
五一二平台的一千人是‘非常义工’,他们是在各方面有NGO工作经验的人员或专业人士,能负责带队,到灾区及医院统筹工作。何德贤又像一阵风般掠过,跟记 者补充说:‘但愿这次的NGO平台提供一个有序的志愿者救援工作,不添乱子、不滥用资源。我举个例子,我们派出其中两个团队,每组八人,到不同的医院做志 愿者管理,一所医院就有几百人报名要来当志愿者,若不管理分流,再加上不停走进医院问病情和打听亲人的生还者,前线医护人员的压力就很大,也会阻塞绿色通 道,阻碍救援。说实在,我们的小组管理效果不错,我们是替政府做“细眉细眼”的救援工作。’
葵丽、牛可佳和莎莎等三位大学生,是另一本土NGO Green SOS成员,虽然没有加入两大平台,却在大学召集义工。救灾不仅是在镜头前抬出一百小时后的生还者,还是在没人看到的政府支援的缺口把讯息和物资第一时间 传达给最需要的人。莎莎和可佳说:‘我们到了华西医院,安排志愿者工作,例如围起消毒区,帮忙需要消毒的人。’Green SOS跟其他平台上的本土NGO,大部分不获政府注册,包括专门关注流动人口和农民工的尚民社会发展研究所;北京农家女文化发展中心;擅长野外工作及登山 的Ci -山水;四川省农民工法律援助工作及曙光社区发展等,以至香港及大分份国际的NGO,都只能在中国设立办事处,而不能成立基金会,包括这次在五一二平台上 的嘉道理农场社区伙伴成都办事处、宣明会昆明办公室。
难能可贵的是,每天都有救灾的新NGO诞生。Green SOS的葵丽便与其他NGO组织者成立了山水自然保护中心,投入的是灾后重建及地震援助讯息平台,成员有建筑师及大学生。他们游离于政府组织,又有别于满 腔热血冲进灾场及医院的个别志愿者,他们其实是志愿者之母,多年来不断培训志愿者,在灾难来临前,已不停警告河流污染、树木砍伐、水库危机、社会问题等静 态灾难。
从汶川地震救援工作可看出中国政府关注人性的一面,同时注重灾后的心理辅导,但中国的大学社工系才刚起步,学生并没上实习课程,也缺少处理灾难的心理辅导 经验,爱白和无国界社工刚好填补了这块空缺。来自香港的无国界社工和四川大学华西医院心理卫生中心连成一线,香港的六位资深社工拥有南亚海啸的救灾经验, 带动社工系学生到灾区进行哀伤治疗,还有三位香港心理学家到成都培训哀伤治疗的志愿者。
震灾后,中国成为一个充满志愿者新手的国家,很多新手走到前线慰问伤者,竟哭得比伤者更伤心,哀伤治疗其实不是这回事。已在灾区工作多天的无国界社工庞志 成说:‘我们会分四个阶段处理,有宣泄悲伤、探知悲伤、肯定抗逆能力和逐步重建生活和朋友网络等,社工会凭经验配合不同活动。大海啸后,我们在印尼及泰 国,由于辅导要透过翻译,我们就有拥抱行动,烧饭聊天,是渗透式的。’他举了一个成功的例子,他们在景秀镇服务灾民,跟一个学校的小朋友做了两天活动,小 学生告诉他,晚上真的可以睡着了。
化解忧伤防止自杀
一个地方在灾难后,自杀率往往会提高,问题不仅在开解忧伤,也在把被诱发的忧郁症根源找出来,避免成为社会问题。其实,震后纷纷亮相的草根NGO,也像灾后抑郁的人们,长期潜伏,就像沱江及泯江浇灌着成都的地下水,一直淌着却没有声影。
直到五月二十日早上,地震第八天,仍不断有来自全国各地的NGO加入五一二平台和NGO四川救灾联合办公室,仍不断有新NGO成立,如果政府善用NGO资源,在这场大灾难里,将能更恰当地分配和管理志愿者,更快令灾民解除震痛。
‘大地震救灾,是中国NGO对政府的一次大型示范。’田军说。
Feb 12, 2008
The First Province-Level Federation of NPOs Established in Beijing
| 我国首家省级慈善公益组织行业联合会上月正式成立 | ||
| 范继辉 千龙网 / 2008-01-02 | ||
| ||
Feb 4, 2008
Philanthropy's New Frontier: China
Philanthropy's New Frontier
Once reviled, charitable giving is growing in China, thanks to a new generation of wealthy individuals
http://philanthropy.com/free/articles/v19/i23/23000701.htm
Mao Zedong formed the People's Republic of China in 1949 after a long and bloody civil war. Among
| ALSO SEE: ARTICLE: Building a Spirit of Generosity ARTICLE: Scrutiny by Chinese Officials Dampens Hopes of Charitable Groups ARTICLE: American Grant Makers Seek to Deepen Their Involvement in China ARTICLE: Big Philanthropists in East Asia: a Sampling of Their Key Donations OPINION ARTICLE: In Asia, a Different 'Art of Asking' |
In the communist nation he established, the government oversaw citizens' welfare from cradle to grave, while private giving was reviled as a symbol of elitist wealth and an affront to the classless society Mao preached.
Six decades later, Chinese philanthropy is re-emerging.
Thanks to its state-run capitalism, China is experiencing massive economic growth. New millionaires are being created at roughly the same pace as in the United States. While many of the affluent are known for their lavish way of life, members of this growing generation of wealthy Chinese are developing a taste for charity.
From 2003 to 2006, mainland China's five most-generous individuals gave at least $640-million to charitable causes, says the Hurun Report, an Asian personal-finance magazine that creates an annual list of the country's biggest donors.
Perhaps the best-known philanthropist is East Asia's wealthiest man, Li Ka-shing. Mr. Li, who lives in Hong Kong, which is part of China but operates under different laws, has donated more than $1-billion during the past four decades in hopes of inspiring a "culture of giving" among Chinese.
"I respect anyone who is willing to contribute his time, energy, and resources to helping the needy," he said in an interview with The Chronicle.
Cultural Differences
The rise of Chinese giving has piqued the interest of American fund raisers. While almost all foreign charities are barred from soliciting within mainland China, U.S. universities and other large nonprofit institutions are sniffing out opportunities to inspire Mr. Li and other Hong Kong tycoons to support their work.
The University of California, for example, in August announced that it had established a fund-raising arm in Hong Kong, to allow Asian donors to receive tax benefits for gifts to any of the system's campuses.
But while such efforts have borne fruit, experts in Asian philanthropy caution that charities need to be savvy about the cultural differences between East and West before expecting windfalls.
Within China itself, the government has gingerly promoted giving and charity work to help close the gap between the haves and the have-nots. While the nation has a growing rich upper class, about 10 percent of its 1.3 billion citizens continue to live on less than $1 a day.
To encourage antipoverty work and other efforts, in the past few years the government has set up regulations to govern nonprofit activities. In 2004, the government ordered homegrown foundations to donate at least 8 percent of their assets each year — U.S. law requires 5 percent — and in January the Ministry of Finance and the State Administration of Taxation set the requirements that a "nonprofit public-welfare social association" must meet to receive tax-deductible donations.
China, however, is wary of giving too much financial and political independence to the country's nonprofit groups, which number around 340,000, though other estimates place the number around two million.
'Mother-in-Law Rule'
The largest and most high-profile nonprofit organizations often are run by retired government officials, and the Ministry of Civil Affairs requires charities to be sponsored by a different government agency to apply for nonprofit status. The regulation, known informally as the "mother-in-law rule," often serves as a barrier to receiving state recognition.
"You need to find a supervisor first, before you can register. But many government organizations will refuse to supervise you," says Yiyi Lu, an expert on Chinese charities and a researcher at the Royal Institute of International Affairs, in London.
Red tape is not the only obstacle facing philanthropy in China.
Other problems include the lack of public information about nonprofit groups, the perception that some donations are bribes to government employees, and the view that wealthy individuals make gifts to benefit their business interests.
Despite these challenges, the Asian nation's economic success and emerging status as a global superpower mean it will have a huge influence on the nonprofit world.
Indeed, some financial analysts predict that China will surpass the United States as the world's largest economy in 20 years. And if the country's cultural and bureaucratic obstacles to charity fall, Chinese philanthropy in the future may someday overtake the storied generosity of the WestFeb 1, 2008
What Experts Say about Situation in China
Social Entrepreneurs in China?
He Fan, an economist, likes to say that “there are a lot of similarities between raising a five-year old and advising the Chinese government.” One has to be patient and make them feel comfortable and confident in their own capabilities so that they can reach adulthood (in the case of his son) or join the international community (in the case of China). But it is important to move slowly: sometimes, the Chinese authorities are not sure whether N.G.O.s are not in fact A.G.O.s –Anti-Government Organisations.
Considering the social upheaval that China is currently facing (massive urbanisation and globalisation), there is no doubt that social entrepreneurs have a major role to play there. Karen Tse, whose organisation concentrates on criminal law in China, reminded us that the word for ‘crisis’ in Chinese is both ‘danger’ and ‘opportunity.’ The perfect mantra for a social entrepreneur…